A Decision Procedure for Rough Set Equalities

نویسندگان

  • Maxim Lifantsev
  • Anita Wasilewska
چکیده

We use the notion of the rough set diagram introduced by Wasilewska and Vigneron 8] to present a general decision procedure for validity of equations in rough boolean algebra. First, we establish equivalence of validity in rough boolean algebra to validity in so called simple rough boolean algebra. Second, we propose a decision method for simple rough boolean algebra, which is to construct and consider all essential cases of models. The decision technique also gives us insights into the structure of rough diagrams: we introduce the notions of simple, simpliied, and full rough diagrams and show that there are 2 S (n) ?1 topologically diierent simpliied rough diagrams over n sets, where S (n) is the number of diierent simple rough diagram conngurations, which is equal to the number of essential cases of models of simple rough boolean algebra for n set variables The idea of rough set was proposed by Pawlak in 1]. The assumption is that initially we have some information about the elements of the universe, according to which some elements can be "seen" as the same. This assumption leads to the following deenitions 2]: A topological space is a pair hU; Ii, where U is a set (the universe) and I is the interior function such that for any A; B U we have I A A, I (A \ B) = I A \ I B, I I A = I A, I U = U. For any A U the set I (A) (is the complement of a set with respect to U) is denoted by C A and called the closure of A. A topological space satisses clopen property if C I A = I A and I C A = C A for any A U. In this case hU; Ii is called generalized rough set 6]. A A A I C Figure 1. Rough diagram.

برای دانلود متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید

ثبت نام

اگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید

منابع مشابه

Evaluation of Rough Set Theory for Decision Making of rehabilitation Method for Concrete Pavement

In recent years a great number of advanced theoretical - empirical methods has been developed for design & modeling concrete pavements distress. But there is no reliable theoretical method to be use in evaluation of conerete pavements distresses and making a decision about repairing them. Only empirical methods is used for this reason. One of the most usual methods in evaluating concrete paveme...

متن کامل

Multi-granulation fuzzy probabilistic rough sets and their corresponding three-way decisions over two universes

This article introduces a general framework of multi-granulation fuzzy probabilistic roughsets (MG-FPRSs) models in multi-granulation fuzzy probabilistic approximation space over twouniverses. Four types of MG-FPRSs are established, by the four different conditional probabilitiesof fuzzy event. For different constraints on parameters, we obtain four kinds of each type MG-FPRSs...

متن کامل

On Approximate Equivalences of Multigranular Rough Sets and Approximate Reasoning

The notion of rough sets introduced by Pawlak has been a successful model to capture impreciseness in data and has numerous applications. Since then it has been extended in several ways. The basic rough set introduced by Pawlak is a single granulation model from the granular computing point of view. Recently, this has been extended to two types of multigranular rough set models. Pawlak and Novo...

متن کامل

Application of Rough Set Theory in Data Mining for Decision Support Systems (DSSs)

Decision support systems (DSSs) are prevalent information systems for decision making in many competitive business environments. In a DSS, decision making process is intimately related to some factors which determine the quality of information systems and their related products. Traditional approaches to data analysis usually cannot be implemented in sophisticated Companies, where managers ne...

متن کامل

Approximate Equalities on Rough Intuitionistic Fuzzy Sets and an Analysis of Approximate Equalities

In order to involve user knowledge in determining equality of sets, which may not be equal in the mathematical sense, three types of approximate (rough) equalities were introduced by Novotny and Pawlak ([8, 9, 10]). These notions were generalized by Tripathy, Mitra and Ojha ([13]), who introduced the concepts of approximate (rough) equivalences of sets. Rough equivalences capture equality of se...

متن کامل

ذخیره در منابع من


  با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید

برای دانلود متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید

ثبت نام

اگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید

عنوان ژورنال:

دوره   شماره 

صفحات  -

تاریخ انتشار 2007